Skip to main content

Table 3 The diagnostic efficacy parameters of the three criteria for PCa in the [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT

From: Which PSMA PET/CT interpretation criteria most effectively diagnose prostate cancer? a retrospective cohort study

[18F]DCFPyL group (n = 55)

SUVmax

miPSMA score

PSMA-RADS

Pathology

Positive (n = 43)

Negative (n = 12)

Positive (n = 43)

Negative (n = 12)

Positive (n = 44)

Negative (n = 11)

PCa (n = 44)

42

2

42

2

42

2

BPD (n = 11)

1

10

1

10

2

9

Sensitivity (95% CI)

95.45% (89.30%, 100%)

95.45% (89.30%, 100%)

95.45% (89.30%, 100%)

Specificity (95% CI)

90.91% (73.92%, 100%)

90.91% (73.92%, 100%)

81.82% (59.03%, 100%)

Accuracy (95% CI)

94.55% (88.55%, 100%)

94.55% (88.55%, 100%)

92.73% (85.87%, 99.59%)

Mistake diagnostic rate (95% CI)

9.09% (0%, 26.08%)

9.09% (0%, 26.08%)

18.18% (0%, 40.97%)

Omission diagnostic rate (95% CI)

4.55% (0%, 11.21%)

4.55% (0%, 11.21%)

4.55% (0%, 11.21%)

Positive predictive value (95% CI)

97.67% (93.16%, 100%)

97.67% (93.16%, 100%)

95.45% (89.30%,100%)

Negative predictive value (95% CI)

83.33% (62.24%, 100%)

83.33% (62.24%, 100%)

81.82% (59.03%, 100%)

Youden Index (95% CI)

86.36% (77.29%, 95.43%)

86.36% (77.29%, 95.43%)

77.27% (66.19%, 88.35%)

AUC (95% CI)

96.49% (91.54%, 100%)

96.28% (91.88%, 100%)

89.87% (80.40%, 99.35%)

  1. PCa: Prostate Cancer; BPD: benign prostate diseases