Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of patients

From: A CT-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics nomogram for postoperative recurrence risk stratification in localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Clinical factors

Center A (n = 395)

Training Set

(n = 281)

Internal validation Set (n = 114)

P* value

Center B

External validation Set (n = 52)

P# value

Age (years)

60.0(53.0; 67.0)

59.0(53.0; 67.0)

60.0(51.2; 65.0)

0.211

58(49; 69.3)

0.377

Tumor-size (cm)

4.0 (2.9; 5.5)

4.1 (2.8; 5.5)

3.9 (3.1; 5.3)

0.980

3.5 (2.5;4.9)

0.084

Sex

   

0.001*

 

0.203

Female

130(32.9)

107 (38.1)

23 (20.2)

 

12 (23.1)

 

Male

265 (67.1)

174 (61.9)

91 (79.8)

 

40 (76.9)

 

ISUP grade

   

0.926

 

0.168

I

14 (3.5)

11 (3.9)

3 (2.6)

 

3 (5.8)

 

II

314 (79.5)

223 (79.4)

91 (79.9)

 

44 (84.6)

 

III

58 (14.7)

41 (14.6)

17 (14.9)

 

3 (5.8)

 

IV

9 (2.3)

6 (2.1)

3 (2.6)

 

2 (3.8)

 

T stage

   

0.08

 

0.574

T1

323 (81.8)

234 (83.3)

89 (78.0)

 

46 (88.4)

 

T2

42 (10.6)

31 (11.0)

11 (9.7)

 

3 (5.8)

 

T3

30 (7.6)

16 (5.7)

14 (12.3)

 

3 (5.8)

 

N stage

   

0.494

 

1.000

N0/x

393 (99.5)

280 (99.6)

113 (99.1)

 

52 (100)

 

N1

2 (0.5)

1 (0.4)

1 (0.9)

 

0 (0)

 

Tumor Necrosis

   

0.417

 

0.785

Absent

362 (91.6)

255 (90.7)

107 (93.9)

 

49 (94.2)

 

Present

33 (8.4)

26 (9.3)

7 (6.1)

 

3 (5.8)

 

Nephrectomy type

   

0.787

 

0.463

Radical

238 (60.3)

171 (60.9)

67 (58.8)

 

28 (53.9)

 

Patial

157 (39.7)

110 (39.1)

47 (41.2)

 

24 (46.1)

 

ECOG-PS

     

0.166

0 score

341 (86.3)

239 (85.1)

102 (89.5)

0.319

49 (94.2)

 

> 0 score

54 (13.7)

42 (14.9)

12 (10.5)

 

3 (5.8)

 

Recurrence

   

0.808

 

1.000

Absent

354 (89.6)

253 (89.1)

101 (88.6)

 

47 (90.4)

 

Present

41 (10.4)

28 (9.96)

13 (11.4)

 

5 (9.6)

 

Follow-up time

48.1(34.9; 63.1)

48.1(35.0; 63.1)

48.0(34.7; 64.4)

0.967

28.5(20.0;44.0)

< 0.001

  1. Quantitative variables were expressed as median (interquartile range) and analyzed by Student’s t test or Mann-Whiney U test. For qualitative variables, percentages or frequencies were calculated and a χ 2 test. *Significant results. P* was compared between the training set and the internal validation set, while P# was based on the comparison between center A and B
  2. ISUP grade, the International Society of Urological Pathology grading system. ECOG-PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status